Pennsylvania Injury Lawyer Talks About Philadelphia Injury To Pedestrian

This article has a sample complaint for a pedestrian who is hit by a car. The Board will also reimburse you for the woman pedestrian.

1. The applicant is Joshua Williams, an adult individual, who lives at the address given in the caption.

2. The applicant is Rachel Williams, an adult individual, who lives at the address given in the caption.

3. Defendant Gina Davis is an adult individual, who lives at the address given in the caption.

4. On or about the 5th October 2006 was approximately 5.15, plaintiff, Joshua Williams was a pedestrian, who suffered from a motor vehicle in the vicinity of Curie Boulevard and University Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as a result, he was taken in serious injury, the details are explained in more detail .

5. At such time date and place, the motor vehicle owned and operated by defendant, Gina Davis.

6. The said accident caused solely by the negligence of the defendant, Gina Davis and was in no way made on the basis of any sort to the actions of the plaintiff.

7. After the accident Mr Joshua Williams was required to undergo medical treatment with the following providers:

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Benjamin Chang, M.D.

8. The plaintiff claimed that the injuries he suffered in the above accident was the result of the defendants negligence, the following:

a. The operation of the motor vehicle on a high and excessive rate of speed under the circumstances;

b. If the motor vehicle under reasonable and have adequate control of the time;

c. Failure to give adequate and sufficient warning of the approach of that vehicle;

d. The company said the vehicle without due regard to the rights, safety and the position of the applicant at the point described above;

e. The violation of various regulations of the City of Philadelphia and the Statute of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the operation of motor vehicles;

f. With the applicant in the normal view of avoiding the otherwise exercise the care and vigilance that plaintiffs;

g. Passing a stopped bus and on double yellow lines before striking the body of the applicant;

h. Otherwise, the absence of care under the circumstances to exercise.

GRAF

Joshua Williams v. Gina Davis

9. The allegations in paragraphs 1 to 8 contained by reference as if on the full set.

10. As a result of the defendants negligence, plaintiff sustained serious injuries, including but not limited to the left fifth finger fractures, contusions, shoulder and knee pain, shock and injury to his nerves and nervous system, and he was otherwise injured.

11. As a result of this accident, the plaintiff sick, sore, lame and caused physical pain all of which was to continue in the future.

12. Another result of this accident, the plaintiff great pain and anguish suffered and will continue to suffer the same in the future.

13. Another result of this accident, the plaintiff an injury, that in whole or in part, a cosmetic disfigurement, which may be permanent, irreparable and difficult it suffered.

14. The applicant has the full tort option, since the vehicle he was wearing at the time of the accident, the full possession of illegal option.

15. As a further result of this accident was plaintiff and / or liable to receive medical attention and care, and spend different amounts or on different issues that have incurred or exceed the sum will be recoverable under the limits in 75 PS § 1711 and he may be obliged to continue to spend such sums or be incurred such expenses for an indefinite time in the future.

16. Another result of this accident can result in the following applicants or other financial expenses or losses that exceed the amounts that he represent or otherwise be entitled to recover or otherwise unrecoverable expenses or losses.

Therefore, plaintiff demands Joshua Williams verdict in his favor and against the defendant, Gina Davis plus an amount of not more than five thousand ($ 50,000.00) Dollars, Free Shipping.

COUNT II

Rachel Williams v. Gina Davis

17. The plaintiff, Rachel Williams hereby includes in paragraphs 1 to 16 above as if set forth herein at length.

18. However due to the aforementioned negligence of the defendant, plaintiff, Rachel Williams of the aid, comfort, support, society, companionship and services of her husband was robbed, and they can be deprived of the same in the future, all that great to their cost and financial loss.

19. Another result of this accident plaintiff Rachel Williams have been or are forced to spend different amounts or caused suffering to various expenses of the above violations by plaintiff, Joshua Williams, and they may be required to continue to spend such sums or incur such expenses an indefinite time in the future.

Therefore, plaintiff demanded Rachel Williams verdict in their favor and against the defendant, Gina Davis plus an amount of not more than five thousand ($ 50,000.00) Dollars, Free Shipping.

Local Marketing
Local Advertising
Local Search
Local Search Help
Local Business Listing
Google Maps
Online Advertising
Advertising on the Internet
Local SEO
Google Search Optimization
Local Marketing
Local Advertising
Local Search
Local Search Help
Local Business Listing
Google Maps
Online Advertising
Advertising on the Internet
Local SEO
Google Search Optimization
Local Marketing
Local Advertising
Local Search
Local Search Help
Local Business Listing
Google Maps
Online Advertising
Advertising on the Internet
Local SEO
Google Search Optimization
Local Marketing
Local Advertising
Local Search
Local Search Help
Local Business Listing
Google Maps